It is my belief that the [Alexander] Technique is by far the most powerful method currently available to improve our conscious direction of ourselves. If you want to learn how to use your mental abilities to make immediate and useful changes in how your body functions, the Alexander Technique is the way to go. The Technique has been around for over a century and has a long history of helping people learn how to stand, sit and move with greater ease and efficiency. Countless performers have used it to improve the quality of their performance, and it has a well-deserved reputation for teaching people strategies for alleviating stress-related conditions such as back pain, stiff necks, tight shoulders and the like.
But the Technique does have limitations. First, it quite limited in its
ability to alter the exceedingly complex and subtle physical
restrictions that lie below the level of consciousness. In my
experience, methods like cranio-sacral therapy are an ideal way to get
at those kinds of restrictions. Second, and of relevance here, it can
also be limited in changing deep-rooted structural imbalances. Because
the Technique relies on mental direction rather than exercises, the pace
of change tends to be gradual. On the one hand, this is a great
strength of the Technique - it never pushes change too fast for the body
to handle. But it also means that, in effect, it might take many
lifetimes to eliminate large physical distortions.
Although oversimplified, I believe a car and driver analogy is helpful
here. A good driver can try to get the best performance possible out of a
car with mis-aligned wheels and defective brakes. But unless the wheel
alignment is corrected and new brakes are installed, there is nothing he
can do to improve their functioning.
Pilates addressed himself to just that kind of issue in humans with his
highly targeted exercises designed to correct specific physical
imbalances and weaknesses. In my case, my abs were weak when I started
with Alexander lessons some 30 years ago, and while their tone may have
improved a bit over that time, they were still very far from having a
good overall tone when I started taking Pilates classes. They certainly
have a way to go, but I doubt that the improvement in their tone which I
experienced - and the corresponding improvement in my core strength and
overall quality of functioning - would ever have occurred if I had not
resorted to Pilates training, or something like it.
Perhaps because of Alexander's disdain for exercises, many Alexander
Technique teachers still view them with some suspicion. There is
sometimes a tendency to think that with enough lessons, the Technique
will take care of everything.
Pilates instructors can also have their blind spots of course. From what
I've seen and heard, they often do not spend nearly enough time and
attention to the way their clients are using their bodies during
exercises. They are sometimes guilty of believing that just because they
tell a client to do an exercise a particular way, perhaps demonstrating
what they want a few times, the client will actually be capable of
doing it that way. In general, Pilates instructors have little or no
concept of "use" - Alexander's term for the way in which we coordinate
our posture and movements. It's my belief that the Pilates Method and
the Alexander Technique can be very complementary ways of learning to
improve functioning - that even a little experience with one can make
learning the other far more efficient and effective.